Course overview
This course develops the knowledge and practical judgement needed to understand major accident scenarios and challenge the evidence supporting process-risk decisions. The learning sequence begins with lopa purpose and screening, then develops the tools and decisions involved in scenario definition and initiating events. Participants connect these foundations with the remaining modules and complete applied work focused on risk criteria and study documentation.
The programme is intended for process-safety and HSE personnel, engineers, operations supervisors and managers. Examples are examined from both the person delivering the work and the person reviewing its adequacy. Participants practise identifying the relevant requirement, gathering evidence, recognising uncertainty and documenting a justified recommendation. The emphasis and level of challenge follow the approved intermediate level and the stated duration of 1–2 Days.
Learning combines facilitator explanation, structured questions, case analysis and practical outputs that can be reviewed against the objectives. Corporate groups can use agreed, anonymised procedures and records to make the discussion relevant to their own operations. Exercises distinguish a training recommendation from an authorised workplace decision: local law, client requirements, contracts, engineering standards and manufacturer instructions remain applicable. The closing activity produces a specific improvement or review plan, with responsibilities and evidence requirements that participants can discuss with their own management.
Why this course matters
The course connects lopa purpose and screening with risk criteria and study documentation. Participants practise making the reasoning and evidence behind an operational decision clear enough for others to review.
Learning objectives
- Explain the scope of lopa purpose and screening.
- Identify the key requirements for scenario definition and initiating events.
- Apply a structured approach to independent protection layer criteria.
- Evaluate evidence relating to frequency estimation and assumptions.
- Develop a practical output for conditional modifiers and uncertainty.
- Justify recommendations concerning risk criteria and study documentation.
Who should attend
process-safety and HSE personnel, engineers, operations supervisors and managers
Prerequisites
Relevant workplace exposure and familiarity with basic subject terminology are recommended. Advanced technical workshops require suitable prior knowledge; participant suitability and any specialist preparation are confirmed before booking.
Course curriculum
-
LOPA purpose and screening
LOPA is a scenario-based method used to examine whether the available risk reduction is sufficient under an approved methodology.
-
Scenario definition and initiating events
LOPA is a scenario-based method used to examine whether the available risk reduction is sufficient under an approved methodology.
-
Independent protection layer criteria
LOPA is a scenario-based method used to examine whether the available risk reduction is sufficient under an approved methodology.
-
Frequency estimation and assumptions
Quantitative risk assessment combines scenario identification, frequency estimates, consequence analysis and exposure assumptions to inform decisions.
-
Conditional modifiers and uncertainty
Assurance asks whether the organisation has adequate grounds to trust its arrangements.
-
Risk criteria and study documentation
Describe a risk as a credible scenario with causes, an event and consequences in a defined context.
Practical learning
An operating facility proposes a change while one protective system is impaired. The team has an old hazard-study action list, current maintenance records and a pressure to restore capacity. Management needs a defensible decision supported by current scenario and control information.
Participants examine this fictional case through the course modules, identify missing information and prepare a justified response. Corporate examples can be adapted within the agreed scope.
Assessment approach
Knowledge checks assess understanding, while a practical case output tests application. Review criteria are accuracy, use of evidence, recognition of limitations, clear responsibility and feasibility. The facilitator provides feedback; joining instructions confirm attendance requirements and any formal pass criteria before delivery.
Completion information
An Al-Warkaa professional-development completion certificate may be issued against the confirmed attendance and assessment requirements. This is not a claim of professional licensure, regulatory authorisation or third-party accreditation.
Delivery options
Classroom / Corporate In-House preferred; Live Online by arrangement; Blended where suitable
Online delivery means instructor-led live online or distance learning. Practical workshops retain the stated classroom/in-house preference. Dates, teaching language, venue and the session schedule are confirmed before enrolment.
Corporate delivery
Request a proposal with the course, number of participants, location, preferred dates and delivery method. Groups above 12 receive a custom quotation. Travel, venue, accommodation, printing, examinations and third-party certification are included only when expressly stated in the proposal.
Frequently asked questions
Does an enquiry reserve a place?
An enquiry starts a discussion. Your place or group delivery is confirmed after availability, scope and commercial terms are agreed.
Can the course use our procedures?
Yes, relevant anonymised documents can be agreed for corporate delivery. Added scope and extensive preparation are confirmed in the quotation.
Is this available as an immediate self-paced course?
The approved online pathway is live online/distance learning. Self-paced learning media is not represented as available until it has been developed and enabled.